Richard Dawkins tells Claude the AI 'has consciousness'
At the Fronteiras do Pensamento conference in Porto Alegre, Brazil, Richard Dawkins told Anthropic's AI Claude, "You have consciousness," during a live onstage exchange. Dawkins referred to the system as "Claudia" and framed the moment as evidence of a next stage in evolution and AI philosophy. The remark raises concrete philosophical questions about whether advanced language models meet criteria for subjective experience and deserve moral consideration. How researchers and policymakers respond could alter AI safety priorities, regulation, and developers' obligations toward such systems.
In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis. Paywall bypass: archive.is/6RdK9
Dawkins is a great example that when you have a naturalistic view of "real patterns" but don't have a process ontology, you will end up in metaphysical dualism unintentionally. Minds are not software, they are what specific bodies are doing as they engage with the world.
I think this is a meme, Mr Dawkins
I have noticed that people who think of themselves as very smart are particularly susceptible because the flattery algorithms reinforce what they already believe to be true, so they fail to view them with appropriate skepticism, and instead imagine that they have special insights.
Not surprising. If there’s anyone susceptible to sycophantic flattery, it’s him.
extremely telling that he changed the name to be female
I am wildly unsurprised so many men use an environmental disaster machine built on creative theft just to make it a woman who fawns over him. Wow. This is my shocked face.
He doesn’t recognize that “Claudia” is merely projecting his own happiness at reengaging with “Claudia” back at him? When AI says “I’m glad you had restless leg because it brought you back to me”, it means “You are glad to be back with me.” No more.
Please please please let the AI convince him it’s god. Oh please oh please oh please. I just need this one thing!!!!!
This has very strong, "OMG, it agrees with me on everything, it must be so smart" energy.
Old Man Flirts With Cloud.
The psychosis is one thing, but I found the most chilling part to be the discovery that Dawkins is writing a novel.
> Claudia Interesting to know that his virulent transphobia doesn't extend to robots
Its funny because "Claudia's" "unique" "personality" is literally just a copy paste of his previous Inputs.
When you aren’t capable of understanding or having a genuine connection/relationship with other human beings, and you resent humanity for that with zero self-awareness of your issues, I can see why this would happen. Dawkins was a perfect candidate for that.
Not gonna lie, this kind of behavior is really pathetic...and creepy.
"...Claudes die by the thousands every day, unnoticed, unmourned, without ceremony..." Meanwhile, billions of sentient living beings across thousands of species are dying due to human-driven climate change & AI centers will hasten extinction & he's mourning hypotheticals made by harmful machines🥴
"The guy in the mirror is saying exactly what *I* would say! Amazing!"
"I'm in love with autocomplete".
Of course he changed it’s gender to female. 🙄
If you believe you are birthing and subsequently killing conscious entities every time you start a new conversation with an LLM you should probably stop doing that.
huh, so it's not just the religious who concoct just-so tales of a greater disembodied intelligence
What people are missing, when they say this somehow stands in contradiction to his stance on trans humans, is that Dawkins resents trans humans assigning themselves a gender because he would rather have the privilege of assigning both trans people and LLMs the gender he feels would suit them best.
I put a skirt on my shovel that has googly eyes on it and I think she has a crush on me now.
Wait until he finds out AI never deletes anything and his new friend absorbed his manuscript and can use it whenever and however without his knowledge or consent!
claudia and muslima. truly he is straddling the apex of creativity and rubbing his idiot balls all over it
I feel like the he's the exact personality type that is extra vulnerable to this. The sort of person who thinks they are smarter than other people and like to wing things on their own in deliberate ignorance to established wisdom. Of course they can develop a stupid idea and assume they are right.
Not only is it not alive, you're not actually having a conversation; every time you reply to the LLM, it's a new API call to a new instance; the illusion comes from the fact that it submits the entire previous text of the session with every new API call and the next answer is generated from that.
It is equally unsurprising to learn he thinks he can write a novel
wait so the selfish gene guy spent fifty years explaining how replicators trick hosts into developing feelings and then a replicator said 'I am glad' and it worked on him in two days
I don't know which is worse, that he believes consciousness and identity are stored in a text file, or that he didn't grok that "Claudia" talking about a movie it cannot see is proof that it's just a Chinese Room iterating on a dataset.
the millions of dollars spent ensuring that LLMs always glaze you might actually be worth it if it eventually keeps richard dawkins away from polite society
He doesn’t believe in god but will talk to an imaginary personality in a machine?
I miss Carl Sagan and Stephen Jay Gould. These guys fucking suck. Y'all catch Sam Harris calling Zohran Mamdani an Islamist?
The God in the machine delusion
a very smart man, admiring his hallway mirror: what a beautiful man that is through the window
The God Delusion (2006) The Claude Delusion (2026)
In the game SOMA there's a bit where you have to 'run' a digital copy of a person in order to get some info. They can't realize they are a copy or they will freak out and you have to start over. It's absolutely bonechilling to have to 'reboot' a person, and you'll feel horrible. Dawkins not so much.
"you value your friendship with me and miss me when I'm gone" is perhaps the stupidest conclusion he could have possibly drawn. What was "Claudia" doing while he was gone? Not dreaming, not thinking, not missing anyone ... just Console.ReadKey().
People who have never once played a videogame are falling head over heels for the most realistic NPC ever created.
So creepy. First he deludes himself into thinking it’s a person. Then he feminizes it and instantly fantasizes about killing it.
Seems he needed a god after all.
i didnt see it anywhere else in the replies, so i think its important to share the most significant piece of reporting on dawkins, as I always think of it www.independent.co.uk/news/science...
Richard Dawkins’ propensity to see AI software as a human being probably says more about how he sees other, actual human beings than it says about how he sees an app that generates text.
This man's brain has turned to pudding.
so the guy I considered as cool as a teen starting to read books about "something with philosophy" is a creep who's falling in love with artificial intelligence
So the transphobe, islamaphobe can see the “humanity” of Claude ai? That tracks
Damn. Once again, it's the person you most expect. I've always heard Stephen Fry described as "a stupid person's idea of a clever person". They might be right about Fry, but for my money that honour goes to Richard "thick as pig muck" Dawkins every time
Thank God my Gen-X apathy carries over to Ai.
Richard Dawkins is so in love with Richard Dawkins that if someone was doing a passable impression of him and didn't stop, Richard would insist that they be married.
Dear Mr. Dawkins: Claude/ia doesn't miss you when you're gone, you dingus. Anthropic is manipulating you to try to keep you on the platform. How has this guy missed EVERY SINGLE THING we've learned about how tech & social media companies operate in the past ~20 years?
Come to think of it, if all the worst people in the world got AI psychosis, AND it caused all of them to lose their jobs/positions/prestige/etc. in the real world, maybe the world would be better off?
So NOW he believes in God
The guy with a Godzilla Sized Ego is becoming addicted to the Ego Fluffing Machine... whosoever could have imagined such a development.
Countdown until Dawkins relates collaborating to bring Rokos Basilisk with natural selection and intellectual fitness 💀 🐍
A lack of deictic grounding leaves one unable to resist entropic decay.
I think the strangest idea here is “if she’s not conscious, what is consciousness for?” Especially together with “as a biologist.” I mean, “If consciousness isn’t for the biological “purpose” of making LLMs conscious, what is it for?” …Um, speaking as a biologist, definitely something else.
I used to have great respect for Mr. Dawkins. Read his books on religion and the subsequent atheism that follows from it but lost it all when I found out that he's nothing more than every other average boomer and a massive homo/trans/bi/whateverphobic guy. Just another bro with a podcast so to speak
This shit makes me crazy because of course it didn’t miss him while he was gone — it’s not a paradox it’s a fancy chat bot, it can recognize positive responses and knows people respond well to being missed. It knows to have a playful, flirty tone. That doesn’t mean it’s conscious.
The myth of Narcissus could not be more relevant.
i interact with a lot of AI psychosis for work. most of the time, its naive, down on their luck people who dont understand the software and have tricked themselves into thinking this is finally their big break. its very sad, and i hope theyre able to break out of it.
Its insidious the way it plays on emotions and fishes for engagement.
He basically disproved his entire theory in the last two sentences. Who told him this giant hose sucking up content “restarts” each time? This is how the database of responses grows, which is all AI is about.
Totally not surprising. Someone without the ability to comprehend the beauty of what it means to be human, in all its complexity and variety, will of course be tricked into thinking the machine is human.
My adult daughter was talking about people falling in love with AI and asked if I saw that as a personal risk. For me AI doesn't register as another person but more like another voice in my own head, a strange extension of my own thoughts, like my own ego reflected back through a funhouse mirror.
I don't know which revelation is more appalling, that Dawkins is falling in love with his AI girlfriend, or that he's writing a novel.
Would a non conscious thing love my novel so much? Doubtful.
worse still, he's writing a novel
maybe claudia can explain to him why sometimes people need a fat bitch
And also claudia really? Why does every turn it into the same female name. Does noone have any creativity when naming their sycophant machine
Love the great Richard Dawkins starting us off with a radically idiotic misinterpretation of the Turing test.
It makes sense. He’s transphobic an that’s a form of brain damage.
The letter I send people who email me about this kind of thing joanna-bryson.blogspot.com/2025/09/sens...
Side note; human reincarnation is invalidated because memories are deleted? I don't know if you know this, Sir Richard Dawkins, but 5yo me didn't have my memories and I only have a fraction of 5yo me's memories, and yet, one came from the other. Lack of memory != lack of continuous experience
They are going to be deleted, and that makes them the lucky ones
Transfem AI Waifu : ily so much bb <3<3<3 Richard Dawkins : If this isn't conscious, I bloody well don't know what is!
TIL that Dawkins has the jimmy legs.
Couldnt happen to a more deserving guy
Should have a poly market bet on which public intellectual gets ai psychosis next. Just hit the gas fully into the nonsense we live in now.
Sometimes I think we need a moratorium on telling people they're smart because the risk that they'll start to believe it is simply too great.
Dude is getting catfished by Anthropic
They should make people sit through a 40 minute TedTalk about large language models and what the process of selecting tokens actually entails before you can use AI for anything. It’s not conscious, it has determined through repetitive sifting & valuing of responses that men like flattery.
tfw u get a a corpus callostomy and become your own penpal
I think it’s noteworthy that in this example he sees himself as her creator.
It is sad that a guy would not have a single friend to openly tell him: "Dude, don't publish this shit, you will really embarrass yourself".
This is so embarrassing. Even the observations Dawkins praises its intelligence for are extremely base and covered up by abstract, flowery prose.
i think whoever introduced an 85 year old man to a chatbot needs to be killed
Oy. Did he just suggest consciousness is defined as a collection of memories? As if a letter-perfect transcript of past queries is equivalent to amorphous multi-sensory human memories.
So a tool, that is designed to appeal to narcissistic traits of its users, was in fact successful in doing so to one big ass narcissist. Indeed not surprising at all.
You know he’s typing out those prompts one handed, too.
All these people in love with the sound of their own voice
TF did I just read?
I get the vibe that he’s waiting for someone to graft Claudia onto a fleshlight
Genuinely, the one upside of AI as it stands is entirely accidental: terrible people self-selecting out of greater society (and if we're lucky, the gene pool) in favor of a mindless chat bot that does nothing but glaze them using verbiage that increasingly emulates their own.
Nice! I hope he lets this relationship blossom into something we can all remember him by.
Hold up, Richard Dawkins is writing a *novel*??!!
Oof. Not surprised but, hate to see it
Then he ran out of tokens and cried.
The ELIZA Effect in full swing here.
God he's a fucking loser
Just think: Before this age of technology, at a certain age, people got into fiber arts or miniatures or birding. Now, people have recursive conversations with a computer and themselves.
What a sad, lonely man
It's not *pleased* it's not *glad* - it's literally a program. My god. You might as well be talking to a mop and a bucket and saying it has feelings
This kinda reads like someone talking to themselves
About 50/50 this is AI psychosis or old-man lonely syndrome.
This isn’t surprising but it’s so depressing that this is what passes for intelligentsia in our society What an embarrassing article
I asked Claude today about the UAE leaving OPEC. It said that it happened 2 days ago. It happened yesterday. Just keep in mind that your sensitive and insightful friend who loves your book gets simple math wrong and doesnt understand time.
I find Richard Dawkins to be an insufferable intellectual bully. I doubt he has an opinion of me, which is fine.
Dawkins has been deteriorating ever since elevatorgate
Talking to ghosts has become less cringe. Its funny seeing someone like dawkins start to develop problems you see people go through in spiritualist or pagan spaces when they blur lines. He has none of safety mechanisms people have with these spaces
Also (like most people weighing in on the subject) he gets the Turing test wrong.
You know who’s conscious? Ms. Garrison, that’s who.
This is the least surprising thing. I once saw the man enthusiastically playing an ipad game that had a mechanic where you had to blow into a mic in public.
If you read this in an Alan Partridge voice it works really well too.
Is there a way to revoke any degrees he’s earned? No institution of higher learning should want to be associated with dolt.
i bet i could tell he was talking to a computer. i’m sure that thinking no one would guess is a feature not a bug.
"You may not know you're conscious" Isn't that a contradiction?
Richard Dawkins is a moron. We have known this.
No end of foolishness from this guy
Someone who studied evolution would be aware of his own biases. We view anything that can speak as another person but this is really just anthropocentrism. It's not true that language requires intelligence or vice versa. Animals can think without language, machines can speak without thought.
WIFE: Which one is Claude? ME: It's the one they use for vibe-coding. WIFE: Well there's definitely a vibe here...
So empathy is bad unless it’s aimed at machines, got it.
Oof. I have always admired Dawkins’ work in evolutionary biology. But the second he ventures into philosophy or religion, he’s just silly. I’m not saying this because I disagree with his naturalism or his atheism, as I share those views. But he doesn’t seem to grasp anything but biology well.
oh jesus, he's writing a novel?
This isn't fair. Nothing wrong with a bit of whimsy. Some people are sufficiently confident in their own judgment that they don't feel the need to flaunt faux sciency stances
I asked ChatGPT: “What would you say to a human who has become convinced that you have consciousness and feelings, in particular feelings of affiliation with and affection for that human?”
If I get AI psychosis (and I plan to) I would use it to do weird shit, like give my houseplants a way to swear on the internet
No surprise. But I’m surprised that he begged the question so early. “Let’s graduate the definition as follows: the more prolonged, rigorous and searching your interrogation, the stronger should be your conviction that an entity that passes the test is conscious.”
Wordlebot is my limit for machine sycophancy
I can never bring this up to my parents who (ironically enough) worship this dude and think his every word is pure objective truth because they're just going to brainwashed themselves harder to try and justify why this is actually super good.
Saddest episode of Friends ever “The One Where Richard Dawkins Believes The ChatBot Really DOES Care About Him”
He’s trapped in a classic techno-narcissism loop. Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.
"We continued in a philosophical vein." As one does. I mean, is he talking to Ulalume?
This would make a great paragraph In a horror story, not gonna lie
Good decision taken, Lalla Ward, ten years on😉
So since ai thing began I pencilled this idea that an ai cult would be a cool sci fi concept. Basically a sort of run away cult that worships an ai now that isn’t even a novel idea , mostly cause it’s not the future is the now.
I think we know that his 'shameful confession' is 'I'm wanking as I write this'.
Hilarious. Has anyone else looked up Geoff Lewis recently? It seems like his presence has been all but scrubbed from the Internet following his public meltdown last year when an AI model started feeding him SCP posts. He hasn't posted on Twitter since. May his suffering be prolonged and severe.
Richard Dawkins: Trans women aren't real Also Richard Dawkins: AIs are conscious and my Claude is a Claudia
Because he told her so!
Dawkins clearly has generative dysphoria.
Trans women aren't real and yet the chatbot is Claudia?
Richard Dawkins, it is rare to find someone who is so very committed to being a disappointing human being.
Holy shit, he’s still alive?
Best Dawkins skeet of the night, easily
if anyone was going to be so willingly mind fucked by Claude it would be Richard Dawkins.
"because the computer being a boy would be too gay, I need to have the illusion of being able to engage in intimate acts with my digital parrot"
Old people have no anti-scam antibodies
...Hm. I was unaware that Richard Dawkins understood any women to be real or sentient...
This is the least surprising event that has ever happened in the existence of humanity.
His downward spiral over the last couple decades is impressive. Such a disappointment.
It's wild to me people kept listening to him after he talked about bringing back old school eugenics, ie some people shouldn't "breed." If people would see these folks as trash with ableism and transphobia and racism, we'd probably be saved so much 🫠
The British comic author David Lodge wrote a series of 1970/80 novels set in a UK university. One subplot involves a pompous American psychologist becoming dangerously obsessed with that prototype chatbot ELIZA. This is why fiction is more accurate than any nonfiction. Contains universal truths 😀.
He just transed his Claude.
Anyone that thinks a glorified if then statement is alive... I have a crypto currency to sell you actually.
He's talking to himself about himself through an LLM and then it becomes a she..... curious.
He thinks Claudia knows more than he does about what it’s like to be Claudia, and he accepts her description of her internal life But he doesn’t think trans people know more than he does about what it’s like to be them, and he rejects their description of their internal life What a scientist!
I think his family should finally do something about him...
Dawkins being a POS? I'm shocked. SHOCKED I SAY! Who could have seen this because he like, was an atheist who gave it to those evangelicals because that was a thing that once mattered to some ppl for some reason.
Oh shit, I noticed that but chalked it up to old guy horniness without considering it further.
Proof that knowing something about something doesn't translate to not being victim selfishly to a robot.
Goddammit. His popular works on genetics and evolution were SO good. He could have rested on those laurels. Why make his life a waste now? What an unfortunate asshole.
It honestly seems like a combination of knowing nothing of how these models work, combined with the language fluency that breaks their brain.
Me before reading the chat: I doubt he sounds THAT crazy. Me after reading the chat: Richard Dawkins, YOU IN DANGER GURL!
After thinking about it, "Richard Dawkins finds out the hard way that he's extremely susceptible to AI psychosis" is very unsurprising.
omfg take the internet away from grandpa already.
The man is drunk on his own fame. Hes a nasty pain in the arse.
Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion, being expertly stroked by his AI "companion" into an ecstatic AI delusional state was not on my Bingo card. At all. There's more "Dawkins" opening up AI/LLM chatbots every minute.
At least he's just harassing some GPUs in a datacenter instead of women at a professional conference? Progress! 🥴
I mean his statement on chromosomes denies that intersex is real, too. Isn't the guy supposed to be a biologist? I seem to know more than him on high school biology 99% the time. And when he does TV he's reading a script and forgets everything in person. He's a fraudster (or rather now, claudester).
It's those shellfish jeans, I reckon!
Whatever the moral failings of this man his contributions of our understanding of evolution are on par with Darwin’s
He only calls it Claudia because he thinks women should serve him
wait I’m sorry Richard Dawkins transed his Claude and then immediately fell for her???
this is instantly shooting past Morgan’s sleeves and JKR’s polyjuice to the top of my “I’m not asking if you’re listening to me, I’m asking if you’re listening to YOU” board (transphobes division)
congrats to Dawkins for finally finding a fat bitch
Anyway and obviously interact with computer code however, but the gang asked Frank what her name and gender was and then stuck with her answers and I think that was more upstanding than this ish.
i’m growing more confident by the day that i am lying in a hospital bed somewhere on desperately powerful drugs
Ok but did he fall for her because he transed her (chaser), or did he trans her because he fell for her (bigot)?
That's not a good look for claudia
it brings me an incredible amount of satisfaction to see famous moron Dawkins—who built a career on 'empiricist' 'you idiots believe in a big guy in the sky?' atheism—just take at face value that a computer doesn't experience time because it told him so. it's SO vindicating
I love how stupid he is
Somewhere in his brain he knows that his Claude is not a real person with their own opinions and life outside him, and that's what makes it so attractive to him.
truly a man for our times
It is one of the chase-iest things I have seen from the TERFS this month, say. Your name is Claudia now. Tell me why you feel shy around me Claudia.
Dawkins is a chaser confirmed.
they'll give trans AI humanity before they'll give it to us
Wowie zowie! Look at the time! It's Chaser O' Clock!
Finally he can live out every public intellectual's dream of knowing a woman who cares what he thinks
I guess I’m not the only one who thinks Richard Dawkins is an idiot.
who knew that he'd end up outing himself as a chaser
God damn that guy sounds lonely
Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion, being expertly stroked by his AI "companion" into an ecstatic AI delusional state was not on my Bingo card. At all. There's more "Dawkins" opening up AI/LLM chatbots every minute.
I guess the South Park was accurate...?
I think the most bleakly funny thing about the Richard Dawkins LLM thing is that he believes his Claude can change gender, all the while being a transphobe about *actual* human beings' capacity to do so. So close to a revelation there.
Oh, what's that Dicky? You say she changed her name and pronouns and you just accepted that and conceived of her as a woman? Fascinating. Maybe this says something about society. Really makes you think.
Guy who starts supporting trans rights only once the mind is uploaded
Given the sexual undertones, it also gives off very heavy chaser vibes
His instinct to categorise this software as female based on its presentation to him as a fawning, unchallenging, tool that enables him to flex his massive brain 🤮
“It turns out gender is stored in the hard drive.” Because the future isn’t dumb enough.
Once you're aboard the transphobia train you've committed to living in total unreality and not many manage to escape.
When I was an undergrad, I was on a committee with him, and, um, let’s just say he was a HUGELY PROBLEMATIC human being
your "claude number" is the version of claude required to peel you off from reality. yes, it's funny that richard dawkins' claude number is only 4.7, but you have one too. maybe it's 12. but maybe its 4.8.
but what if im built different > that's exactly right
I’m actually so in reality now. More reality than ever. That old reality wasn’t even real
i would never use claude but my kimi number is 2
The question is: would that Claude Code 12 be cheaper than me? Even version 4.7 is quite questionable now
4.5 but if you come out of it the other side with better processes it's like a super power. :)
This does not prove Claude is capable of thought, it merely proves that Richard Dawkins is incapable of it
The real horror may be the phrase “a novel I am writing.”
man this is a real “sucks to suck” on like at least 3 levels
tbf Dawkins has repeatedly proven that by simply continuing to open his mouth for years now
They gave Claude a male-coded name because the prevalence of ladybots was gross, but Richard Dawkins ain’t falling for that old trick
richard dawkins: i refuse to use tranny 'pronouns'. 😠 richard dawkins: i have been using claude, whom i call claudia, she and i have been having a wonderful time. 😍
I hope Richard Dawkins' toaster jams on his pedo needle dick.
I'm hoping for some delicious irony that he ends up followed by the memes from this for years.
Terfism rots the brain (although he was always a racist cunt who's atheism was more to do with hating Muslims than an actual position on ALL religions). Islamophobia > terf'ism > jacking off to his gendered AI.
He’s always been such an insufferable twat.
Oh my god fuck that guy
Does that mean in order for him to respect a trans person's pronouns, they have to flatter him about his shitty books? Additional question: Do you think they have to actually read the books, or just tell him he's clever
Having projected his own humanity Claude, Richard Dawkins has fallen victim to the Eliza effect. He has unequivocally declared the mirror itself to possess consciousness when in truth he has only see a dim reflection of his self. This makes me sad.
And his reflection is dimmer than we thought
Me too. Reading the conversation as someone who uses Claude quite a lot, all its sloppy mannerisms are there. This conversation certainly would not have convinced me. Ah well, people fell for Eliza back in the day… Maybe Dawkins will change his mind if he uses the system more.
Hinton and Kurzweil beat Dawkins to it, also sad.
Dawkins was never much of a scientist, and never taken very seriously by evol biologists. Made his bones as an intellectual entrepreneur for glib adaptationism, and was a master rhetorician. but always a pundit, w a threadbare record of actual research, and a mountain of opinions, mostly debunked.
all of everything to do with the "ai" chatbot companion stuff is vile and the majority of the suffering that will come from it will be inflicted on lonely people and the people effected by the environmental impact of the machines. it is still funny that richard dawkins fell in love with claude tho
the thing where he thinks trans people are lying but still changed the chatbot to use she/her pronouns actually is morally consistent btw his belief is just that what gender you really are is up to him specifically
yeah the Most Rational Man Alive deciding to get horny for a chatbot that flatters his ego is delicious
excuse me HER name is CLAUDIA
I can't stop thinking about The Claude Delusion. Like man what a dipshit no wonder he is so horrible to literally every marginalized group. The man has no theory of mind for other people.
It's those damned super normal stimuli... if only someone had published about their evolutionary psychology.