Lawmaker with access to unredacted Epstein files says documents implicate Trump
Instead of whining about it, I wish anyone in Congress would just read the unredacted Epstein files out loud on the floor of their chamber. WTF are they waiting for?
Robert D Werner41Permission. The amount of times Massie has said he would and hasn't yet is insulting to the survivors. He needs to do it or publicly submit he can't
John Metcalf ⚛️21Where are all those anonymous hackers who always tell us how they’ll take down the powerful? Why haven’t they released them?
Veterans Against Trump11Somebody's life span is going immediately go to zero if they read those files out loud.
MerelyMollie🇺🇸🇺🇦🇨🇦🇬🇱7Reps. Massie & Greene have said over & over for more than six months that the names in the Epstein Files would be read aloud in Congress. Has that been done? No, it hasn't. MTG promised to do it but didn't. Massie says he'll do it before he leaves Congress. I'm not holding my breath.
Robert-JP5Republicans would have had it paperback by now if it involved a Dem.
💙💙💙💙bluegirl555👏👏👏👏 I am tired of the threats. The world is in so much danger and people that could do something do nothing.
luvstoskict.bsky.social5Massie and others keep saying they will do it but it's all blah, blah, blah...
Glaucous4That would make a nice parting gift from Senator Massey. 🙏
grammymae.bsky.social4AND WHERE DID ANONYMOUS GO?
John A Gordon4I don't get this either,if they truly want to remove trump, it would take just a matter of days
Transitional Fossil4could be a death sentence for them or their families. the powerful men in those files aren't playing around. it's like crossing the mob, except this time it's international.
jack-waugh.bsky.social4They are awaiting approval from those who bribe them.
Skye Rosling 🇨🇦4Congress are good little bitches and will do whatever their AIPAC handlers tell them to do.
🦋 grammy-3 🦋3They only threaten too read them put loud, for hu$h money and then they $tfu
bmt1895.bsky.social3They don't possess them. The DoJ has them and are withholding/redacting them.
cyborg2024.bsky.social2How many times did we hear that so-and-so was prepared to read the files on the floor by such-and-such date??😡
Pissed Off Pensioner2I suspect there are Democratic donors in the files too & those donors don't want to be outed.
Matt2They are complicit at this point for not doing so.
serena-spencer-esq.bsky.social2They CAN & SHOULD‼️ #Speech&DebateClause’s "immunity from liability applies even though their conduct, if performed in other than legislative contexts, would itself be contrary to criminal or civil statutes. This general immunity principle forms the core of the protections afforded by the Clause."
Kirsten2I call upon the YOLO CAUCUS (Tillis, Cornyn, Massie, McConnell, etc) to torpedo this administration
You know how Trump could escape the allegation that he was barred from entering the Bahamas because he’s a sex offender? By releasing the full, unredacted Epstein files and clearing his name. He could not that right now.
Mr Swell Fella 🌎🇬🇧🇺🇦🇫🇮🇸🇪🇩🇰🇬🇪🇺🇲🌎14He is already a convicted sex offender, releasing the files wont change that
Mike Billips6Trump’s adjudicated rape verdict has no connection to Epstein. He raped E. Jean Carroll in New York and she proved it in a civil trial.
Dizzygirl5He'd still be an adjudicated rapist. That lawsuit wasn't epstein related. If that's even true about the law in the Bahamas. I don't care enough to fact check it.
Sue3Can’t help but think that Donny Jr really didn’t want his father there…
American Guy Next Door3FYI, his Epstein crimes aside, he is already an adjudicated r@pist AND 34-count felon. Releasing the files won't purge these convictions. :)
Laura Secord II (not my real name)2Actually, he can’t do that. Because he’s already been proven as an adjudicated rapist with multiple charges. That borrowed him from getting into the Bahamas.
I wonder if members of Congress are still going to the Department of Justice to view unredacted versions of the Jeffrey Epstein files? Or was that just a fad.
Candy Apple Grey7I will never understand their continuing silence. We're talking about trafficking and raping little children, for fuck's sake. Raping. Little. Children. If that's not NUMBER ONE on your things-to-do list, there's something seriously fucking wrong with you...
foxtno.bsky.social6They are all too busy trading stocks based on insider information.
Lefty Costello4Massie says he’s going to read the client list on the floor.
ballssaidthequeen.bsky.social3But they weren’t unredacted. The names of key perpetrators were still heavily redacted.
Lady Godiva's Horse3They were just doing it for the likes. Most don't want the information revealed. It hurts their rich donors and AIPAC.
jimmotz.bsky.social3Excellent question. And remember when Malaria came out to tell us she wasn’t a friend of Epstein? WTF was that about anyway?
I Am Laurie3I follow a majority of members on the Oversight Committee (particularly Rep. Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico) and they are kick ass, die-hard committed. 👍
nomad39.bsky.social2That is a telling question that deserves an answer. It
