Skip to content

Vice President JD Vance calls out Sen. Lindsey Graham on live TV

politicsJun 15, 2026502,679

Vice President JD Vance named Senator Lindsey Graham on The View, saying "I'd caution Lindsey Graham" and publicly distancing himself from Graham's stance on the U.S.-Iran agreement. Vance defended the pact, asserting that Iran will not receive funds unless it meets its obligations and citing a memorandum of understanding signed by President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. The exchange highlighted a clear split within Republican foreign-policy ranks over terms that critics say grant Iran access to roughly $300 billion in reconstruction funds. The confrontation matters because it signals the vice president is staking out control of the administration's messaging and pushing back at hardline senators ahead of Congress reviewing the deal.

Leah McElrath
@leahmcelrath.bsky.social

Lindsey Graham puts the Iran deal squarely on the shoulders of JD Vance, possibly positioning Vance to become the subject of a stab-in-the-back myth to excuse Trump’s foreign policy failure:

Lindsey Graham
@LindseyGrahamSC
X.com
I am pleased to hear the memorandum of understanding with Iran to allow the Strait of Hormuz to open has been agreed to. I will be watching closely the ensuing negotiations regarding Iran's nuclear program and other matters.
I am somewhat concerned that Iran's view of the agreement seems different than what the American negotiating team is claiming.
Under our law, any nuclear deal with Iran will be sent to Congress for review and a vote. I look forward to reviewing the final product and I believe it is imperative that the architect of the deal, Vice President Vance and his negotiating partners, be part of the process in presenting the final deal to Congress.
6816h ago
Leah McElrath71

The White House is also making Vance the face of the deal in the eyes of the public:

K🤦‍♀️𝙑14

*See Last line. Suddenly Congress is trying to be relevant again? A day late and billions short aren’t they?

dontlistentoanyone.bsky.social11

lindsey graham is up for reelection, this year, in south carolina. he is trying stake out a position that is against the war, but not anti-trump. in other words, he is revealing his weakness.

gp2k.tikimail.org10

It's weird Graham thinks Congress needs to sign the deal but doesn't need to sign anything to start the war or pay for the war

kelden.bsky.social10

If it were a great agreement, the President would crawl over broken glass to sign it. No way he’d let someone else take the credit. That’s all I need to know about how good of a deal this is.

A. Nobody6

Congress needs to approve something?

Billy Juggernaut Antifa4

It’s also interesting that he’s now concerned about what the law is. He seems to use laws as either necessary, or to be ignored, depending on his desired outcome.

Along for the ride 🌮🐷3

The "under our law" part makes my eyes roll.

steve-degenaro.bsky.social3

G7 summit begins today. Trump announces agreement with Iran that will be “signed” Friday. The Summit ends Wednesday. Wanna bet the agreement is called off by Thursday morning?

EASTMAN2

You can’t put lipstick on a pig, but you can put eyeliner on a Vice President.

Paul A.2

Can we get an agreement that a negotiated deal that leads to an agreement to negotiate a deal isn't much of a deal?

🦋 B34RS GYRL 💙2

If this is true, notice how Trump hasn't referred to Vance recently during these negotiations not 1 single time? There's definitely some rivalry going on between POTUS and VEEP.

Fighting 502

Is Lyndsey Graham todays "Littlefinger" ?

The Bulwark
@thebulwark.com

Vance: "I'd caution Lindsey Graham and anybody else not to believe the hardliner propaganda in Iran, but to believe what's actually in the agreement…Iran doesn't get a dime of money unless they perform their obligations."

915h ago
spanieldors.bsky.social18

So you’re saying that you’re giving Iran money as part of the deal?

Whatthehell13

Hmmm. That sounds like a familiar arrangement. Just a lot more dimes.

curlyjefferson613.bsky.social12

What are the chances Iran is gonna say “we aren’t performing until we get our money” ?

Senator Zeitgeist7

I’m old enough to recall how “incredibly insane it was that USA was “giving” hundreds of millions to Iran.” *of their own money

SD5

So now giving Iran cash is ok apparently.

Rita 🌻5

Billions of dollars, 13 lost American military, 100 dead Iran children and a loss of multiple bases and weapons to get us right back to where we were with Obama’s Iran deal, Vance isn’t fooling anyone because he is an admitted liar.

Todd5

Money for Medicaid and SNAP - slashed, money for scientific research - cut, money for education- diminished. But we have $300 billion dollars to give Iran? That’s $1,875 for every US taxpayer.

beaker66.bsky.social4

The “agreement” which is nothing more than another understanding to continue talking and which has still not been publicly released.

El condor pasa4

lol pallets of money after dropping billions for the war.

Andy 🇨🇦🇺🇦🇲🇽3

Really knucklehead?! Where are the monitors? What a choad!

Carl Mucha3

I've seen more details in a fantasy football trade.

Auburn Blake2

Which would imply they have made the 'agreement' available for people to read and analyze. True? Nah...

MikahMiriam2

Believe our hardliner propaganda, not theirs.

jasonroberts3114.bsky.social2

I understand the concept of “enshitification” of life in general, but it’s impressive that the US regime has taken this to geostrategic levels by just making *everything* worse.

2 sources