Skip to content

Conservation groups sue over Endangered Species Act habitat change

scienceJul 14, 202620526

Today conservation groups and fishing guide Chris Daughters filed suit in federal court in San Francisco to block the Trump administration’s new interpretation of the Endangered Species Act that says “harm” does not include destroying a species’ habitat. The complaint says the change reverses 50 years of bipartisan understanding and contradicts the Supreme Court’s reading in Babbitt v. Sweet Home and the ESA’s stated purpose to conserve ecosystems species depend on. Plaintiffs ask the court to set aside the rule and force the agencies to evaluate the impacts of this major interpretive change, which the complaint says the administration illegally failed to do. Plaintiffs and attorneys warn the new definition would allow logging, damming, and other habitat destruction that would imperil grizzlies, salmon, spotted owls, marbled murrelets, and other species. Wildlands and conservation lawyers argue habitat loss is the primary driver of listings and extinctions and point to the Sierra Nevada yellow-legged frog, now about 90 percent gone, as an example. The complaint cites recent Klamath River dam removals that reopened historic salmon habitat as evidence of why habitat protections have been central to species recovery.

3 sources