Skip to content

Contempt prosecution of Rajiv Menon KC criticised as 'chilling' for lawyers

newsJul 23, 2026261,601

The prosecution of leading human rights barrister Rajiv Menon KC for contempt of court over his closing speech in the Palestine Action trial has been criticised as chilling for the profession by Riel Karmy-Jones KC, chair of the Criminal Bar Association. Menon is due to stand trial next week accused of breaching the judge’s directions in the trial of six people over a 2024 direct action at Elbit Systems UK’s Filton arms factory near Bristol. Mr Justice Johnson referred the question of contempt to Mr Justice Nicklin, who ruled Menon should face proceedings after an earlier referral was overturned on procedural grounds. Karmy-Jones said barristers are changing speeches and becoming “uncertain and scared” of what they can say, and warned the issue feels driven by the politics of the subject matter. Labour peer Shami Chakrabarti said the judges had made “a terrible, capricious mistake” and acted in “a very chilling manner.” Helena Kennedy KC called the prosecution “another assault upon our justice system,” and Gareth Pierce described it as “terrifying.” Nicklin’s court order alleges Menon deliberately breached Johnson’s directions and made statements capable of suggesting the court was not impartial, citing Menon’s references to defendants being prevented from giving evidence about Elbit Systems and to Elbit being “protected” and “wined and dined in the corridors of power.” Families of Hillsborough victims, whom Menon represented, also expressed support for him.

George Monbiot
@georgemonbiot.bsky.social

A barrister represents his clients in court. Clients who are political dissidents. He now faces criminal prosecution for doing so. Not Turkey. Not Egypt. Not Russia. England. Astonishing, deeply disturbing, and part of a long slide towards authoritarianism. www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2026...

114045d ago
Quoting this
Legal C18

To call this rather misleading post out. His client wasn’t a “political dissident”. They were charged with (and found guilty of) criminal damage. He does not face criminal prosecution for “representing his clients”. He faces prosecution for contempt. /1

Lynne Gray6

I am deeply ashamed of our so-called #justicesystem. Judge #JeremyJohnson should be recused from ever acting in court again. His behaviour is an affront to all that they pledge an oath on. And #UKLabour is not the party of the working people, it is turning Britain into an #authoritarian state.

David Nice5

And this is on Burnham's watch. I fear his words about Israel and Gaza - clearly 'genocide' will never fall from his lips - were tokenistic and he'll do nothing about the outrageous prosection of peaceful protesters etc.

Rachel A. Rosen 📚💙🪐4

Fellas, is it normal to arrest lawyers for defending their clients?

Chris Gooch3

This cannot be legal. Everybody needs representation in court

Dr Susan B.2

What? This is enough to bring me out on the streets. For how must longer must we criminalise those who support Palestine? Boy, have we got this wrong.

Phil M 🦻🏼💚 🍉 🏳️‍⚧️ 🇵🇸2

Authoritarianism doesn't knock on your front door, it sneaks in through the back when you're not looking.

Wokerati International Brigades #FreePalestine #Antifa4ever2

When is Andy Burnham going to revoke the attacks on our democratic freedoms by the Starmer cabal and pay reparations to the victims?

Mr Garvie to you2

that sums it up best . its a stich up against political protest . nothing screams corruption more

1 source