Skip to content

PM Burnham tells schools to adapt teaching to local business needs

educationJul 28, 202631812

Prime Minister Andy Burnham will tell schools across England to adapt curricula for pupils aged 14 and above so teaching is more responsive to local employers, placing technical and vocational skills alongside traditional academic subjects. The plan, drawn in part from the Greater Manchester baccalaureate Burnham introduced as mayor, will give mayors and other local leaders from September 2028 a role working with schools, colleges and employers to design training tied to local jobs. No 10 called the proposals "a fundamental change to the education system" and the government will prioritise funding for technical and vocational qualifications while directing Ofsted to recognise their value. Burnham said the aim is to create parity between vocational and academic routes, saying Britain should "value the hard hat every bit as much as the graduation cap." The move is presented as part of a devolution drive to tackle youth unemployment and reduce the benefits bill, responding to Alan Milburn’s report that about 1 million young people are not in education, employment or training; Milburn welcomed the overhaul. The initiative is being unveiled during a week of policy announcements that will also address adult social care, defence and devolution, and it will be combined with other reviews into the benefits and disability systems.

Chris Dillow
@chrisdillow.bsky.social

If this had been policy in the 70s (as it partly was), towns would have produced lots of mining engineers & metallurgists just before pits & steelworks closed. As the yanks say, you should skate to where the puck's going, not to where it is. www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

23545d ago
Dr Jo Kershaw
@mthrjo.bsky.social

Even if the government is right to be betting the house on AI (and I suspect the way things shake out will be different to what we expect), this is likely to have the problem Computing as a subject has always had in schools, ie it’s pretty much instantly out of date. www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...

13145d ago
Dr Jo Kershaw55

Teaching “manufacturing” in schools strikes me as definitely Manchesterism (deprecatory) but I wonder what on earth he envisages as the content of the lessons?

Sam Turner19

There is literally zero chance that any narrow tech skill taught at 14 will still be relevant 4+ years later when they enter employment. We've known this since the 1980s. The only tech skill I learned that remained useful was touch typing. And machine sewing

Krittika11

I’m not liking this one bit, this has “only one [set of people] can afford to learn art, philosophy, science, literature etc and the rest just need the three Rs” written all over it

Lorna10

This certainly fits with my children’s experience: my eldest was interested in IT for GCSE until a tech savvy dad of one of his classmates pointed out that the course was absurdly old fashioned and he’d be much better off teaching himself (which he’s been doing)

Charlie Stross5

Back in 1988 I started an A-level in Computer Science at night school. Bailed halfway through it—while there were BBC computers in the lab and programming them was part of the course, the syllabus mostly focussed on early 1970s mainframes. (I got onto a degree-level course the next year instead.)

Alicia5

One of my nieces (in Australia) did part of her hairdressing apprenticeship through school - she was released a couple of afternoons a week to do the college components and had a Saturday job in a salon for the prac components, so by the time she'd finished year 12 she was almost qualified.

Quoting this
Rose Schmits198

Labour keeps making it clear that to them we dont live in A Society, we live in An Economy

The Author, Séamas O'Reilly131

I was a tech-savvy teen - my dad was a PC hobbyist who had us building servers and LANs from the age of 12 - and my GCSE classes in ICT (the term IT hadn't been adopted yet!) were hilariously outdated. In 2002, our textbooks still said "one day, five million people will be using electronic mail".

John Oxley89

Again, very few of these aren't just a combination of maths, literacy and critical thinking and school is the best part to impart and hone those broad skills. And employers need to suck it up and actually care about proper training, with the incentives set right to encourage it.

Anna Orridge40

Yes. And also employers have to train entry level staff. It's a cost, suck it up. You are not going to get somebody walking through the door who knows all your processes and quirks. You want more of those people? Well, put some effort into retention then.

Kittie 🖤🦝38

in the early 2000s the jobcentre were always sending me on basic bitch IT courses, but job postings were always asking for people who could use Excel. I once asked if they could send me on an Excel course instead and he was like lol are you kidding, they cost a fortune

Elizabeth Taylor25

I’m not an education policy expert so please be gentle with me and don’t jump down my throat. But I don’t like the sound of this announcement. School should be learning and intellectual enrichment, not a job factory.

Leftback15

I'm agreeing with the good doctor here. This is little more than "Your next job can be in cyber" except with the magic pixie dust of AI.

Martin Nutbeem10

I think you could arguable teach the fundamentals and then go to project based "student as creators" style learning which would fit the ever changing landscape. This would equip kids with a skillset to thrive with new tech. But obviously schools are not equipped for this so it won't happen.

legalized gamboling7

the more i have engaged with technology as a creative pursuit the more i believe there is an evergreen curriculum that could be built around the fundamentals of physical computing, logic, and the basics of electricity through tinkering and experimentation link tech to its material reality!

Craig5

I've seen a few takes like this today, I disagree with them though. Computing at school is foundational. Much of the stuff I was taught in my 1980s Computing O Grade is still as relevant today as it was then. You can never go wrong with a solid foundation in any subject.

Chris Bertram
@crookedfootball.bsky.social

Translation: Uni is not for the likes of you, and besides we've cut the places and we need people to pick the crops and wipe the arses. (The man delivering this message has an English degree from Cambridge)

9045d ago
Nick Harkaway
@nickharkaway.com

I don’t have anything close to a knowledge base that would allow me to evaluate this from and education pov. BUT I am fascinated by one aspect. 1/n www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

4245d ago
Quoting this
Mallory Moore121

Seeing this story and the govt are slashing science funding and advanced engineering apprenticeships while in my city (Manchester) Sci/Eng is one of our big things. We've got a statue of Alan Turing, we've got the Jodrell Bank telescope nearby (that the govt are also shutting down).

elia ayoub75

I’m worried that more and more of an already struggling education sector is being pushed to cater to a business-first approach instead of one which actually values education as an end goal in itself

dr. thrasher also believes netanyahu is a war criminal51

the modern labour party has done so much damage to the people of england and the world (esp to migrants, trans ppl, students, medical patients, medical providers and workers). they have effectively undone more of the post-wwii welfare state than thatcherite tories & will kill it all if allowed to

So Mayer22

I don't either, but given that the only large-scale businesses opening anywhere in the UK are Amaz*n warehouses and data centres, the unspoken point here seems extremely obvious, which is that they are donating to (bribing) the govt to produce company town workers.

Maria W. Norris13

This is a brilliant thread, and I wanted to chime in with my 2 cents, from both a pedagogical and a human rights perspective. TLDR: The whole thing smacks of 'the children are yearning for the mines". 1/

Steven Perkins4

“Tie the curriculum into the local jobs market, a thing which is fixed and unchanging. Also, nobody ever moves to a different area after they finish school.”

Chris Farnell4

What I want to know is is this going to be rolled out across wealthier catchment areas? Or are we just inventing secondary mods again?

Aaron Helton2

Because the same forces are at work in so many places, mass urbanization has been a trend in all those places for a reason. I'm one of the people who looked around the many (US) places I grew up and saw no opportunity to do anything that interested me.

1 source