Skip to content

UK CMA drops vet ownership disclosure rules

petsAug 30, 202618365

The Competition and Markets Authority changed its draft orders so veterinary practices no longer must name their ultimate corporate owner, allowing companies to register a brand or the original practice name instead of the multinational or private equity parent. The CMA’s own investigation found pet owners pay 16.6% more on average at large vet groups than at independent practices and judged the £6.3bn market not fit for purpose. Earlier proposals in a white paper had included capping prescription charges at £21 and stronger ownership transparency, but the CMA softened the disclosure language from naming the “corporate vet group” to identifying the “network or group.” The Progressive Veterinary Association has threatened judicial review, saying the change permits multinational and private equity owners to obscure control of local clinics. More than 60% of UK veterinary practices are owned in whole or part by six groups: CVS, Pets at Home, Medivet, IVC, VetPartners, and Linnaeus, whose parent is Mars Petcare. The CMA defended the wording by saying ultimate parent names can be unrecognisable and may not provide meaningful benefit to pet owners.

Prem Sikka
@premnsikka.bsky.social

UK pet owners risk being ripped off by private equity firms as vet ownership rules change. CMA says vet firms don't need to disclose their ultimate owners. Why not? Why is ownership by PE to be obscured? Pet owners pay 16.6% more on average at large vet groups than at independent practices.

30745d ago
1 source