Digger reviews: Tom Cruise's climate satire earns mixed notices
There are two good movies with Tom Cruise in them: "Eyes Wide Shut" and "Magnolia' and that's entirely because those directors understand that fundamentally Tom Cruise does not have a soul.
Collateral too, for the precise same reason.
I'll up it to three for _Edge of Tomorrow_ because above/beyond the reasonable execution of the concept you get to see Cruise die in many different ways, which not even the _Mission Impossible_ movies give you.
Interview With The Vampire would like a word
I watched the Firm recently and was like "this guy is supposed to be charming?!"
He was a great Lestat, similar reasons
Never could stand Tom Cruise. One of the worst actors yet Hollywood keeps re casting him for some reason.
Oooh, boy, is DIGGER a missed opportunity. Desperate to be DR. STRANGELOVE but unable to make the satire sharp enough or funny enough. Simultaneously thinks it's smart and the audience is too dumb. Riz Ahmed and John Goodman strike it right. My review is live: thefilmmaven.com/digger-revie...
Writing is a real skill. Even with the biggest stars and massive budget, movies need incisive writing. Strangelove had it. And the restricted mise en scene makes it more effective rather than less. We didn't need unlimited cgi to make Strangelove great. That would have hurt it.
If you enjoy my thoughts on movies please consider subscribing to The Film Maven (I have a free tier)! Not only do you get my recommends on what you should watch, I also read the pop culture tea leaves the trades aren't covering. TheFilmMaven.com
My Globe review of DIGGER is up. I suppose I should have expected that the director of the worst best picture Oscar winner, and the man with an ego so big that you can see it from space, would make a movie so insufferably bad that I needed a stiff drink after it. www.bostonglobe.com/2026/09/29/a...
So I guess it's not secretly a musical?
In addition to the Birdman nonsense, AGI winning Best Director over George Miller for Fury Road is insane even by Oscar standards.
i cannot WAIT to see this in vistavision on sunday
Nearly spit out my drink reading the Editor's Note at the end of this.
Wow! To rise below COCKTAIL and DAYS OF THUNDER and MI:2 is an impressive feat.
The make up was the dead ringer for its badness.
Alejandro G. Iñárritu’s DIGGER is BARDO blended with BIRDMAN, a satire about the didacticism of contemporary satires. It doesn’t work and Tom Cruise is adrift. “It’s instead a sneering premise awaiting a drop of humanism.” My review via @ebertvoices.bsky.social
There are a few spoilers in my review of DIGGER. It was just impossible to write about the movie without, well, writing about the movie.
And now we wait for the “they purposefully made it bad” takes
movie people doing the dead dove "I don't know what I expected" meme
Tom Cruise is not a person who should be allowed to star in a satire. If he wants to star in your satire, it probably needs a heavy rewrite. I like Iñárritu, but this does not shock me either.
"It's excruciatingly painful that this languid, self-satisfied film doesn't work." Exactly the tone I got from the preview; I recoiled from its smugness like a vampire in the sun. No thank you & perhaps read the room re: a "satire" about awful Men hero-ing in on problems they're the cause of
oh very good at long last someone is willing to take the universally-beloved Don't Look Up down a peg maybe some satires are getting more overt and screaming because shit is real real bad and nobody's doing anything about it
"A satire about the didacticism of contemporary satires" is quite a movie to make during an era when satires are rarely financed or made in any art form because corporations stifle them.
Scroll down 1/3 of the way, and then you get the "wait, *that's* what DIGGER is?" spoiler reveal and, my goodness, it's a jaw dropper.