Skip to content

Assisted Dying Bill fails to clear House of Lords

newsApr 24, 202643650

The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill failed to clear its stages in the House of Lords after peers filibustered the measure and the final debate concluded, causing Parliament to run out of time to pass assisted dying legislation. The bill had majority support in the House of Commons but did not complete the Lords stages before the parliamentary timetable expired, so it will not become law this session. The collapse leaves efforts to legalize assisted dying for terminally ill adults off the parliamentary agenda for now, prolonging the status quo on end of life choices.

The Guardian
@theguardian.com

My assisted dying bill has a democratic mandate – the Lords who blocked it today do not | Kim Leadbeater

9844d ago
PhilT6028

Maybe the Lords feel they are more at risk of families turning the Assisted Dying Bill against them?! Seriously, this is so wrong. End of life is complicated & undignified enough as it is. Allow people a final choice dear Lords!

occamseraser.bsky.social6

I really despair at the determination of certain people (in this case unelected dotards and religious nutters) to ensure their fellow human beings are denied a dignified and peaceful death. I don't think they consciously intend to visit fear, suffering and humiliation on people. But they are.

iameuropean1.bsky.social5

The Lords are, yet again, setting out why they should be abolished and a second elected chamber should be installed.

Bored Aardvark5

Perhaps this time you could really listen to people’s concerns about the serious flaws in it, and not just let your supporters paint them all as religious nutters.

rembetis.bsky.social4

Totally lost in this debate, and ignored by Kim Leadbeater, a coalition of over 350 disability rights organisation is against this Bill. It is essential that Kim Leadbeater and Parliament properly take their concerns on board before ramming a defective Bill through.

Andy Econo3

Alternatively, she put a poorly written bill before parliament, appealed to emotion when peers (some of whom were disabled) amended it to reflect the concerns of disability rights organisations, and now she's having a tantrum.

Katie Thomas3

Glad they blocked it. Glad that MPs have some scrutiny and accountability too.

Lucy Fyson3

Abolish the House of Lords. (Yet another thing Starmer lied about. 👇) www.theguardian.com/politics/202...

Yesfan1 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🐸3

7 Lords a leaping over democracy!!!

Sue Pascoe3

Not true. The Lords are conducting their proper constitutional duty as a revising chamber. The fact the bill didn’t have enough time to pass through parliament in the normal manner is partly because it was a private member’s bill and second it was badly drafted.

Lawrence2

The House of Lords has to go! Hereditary and religious peerages are incompatible with democracy and justice. If the bigots who opposed this bill through the perversion of filibustering wish themselves to die in agony, that's fine by me, but to impose an insufferable death on others is pure evil!

John2

I watched my dad decline & wither away with no dignity thanks to dementia. He said to me when it gets bad lad i want you to shoot me, of course i didn't but I'd want the same thing if I'm going to suffer the same fate.

3 sources