Skip to content

Sen. Van Hollen backs Maine candidate despite Nazi-linked tattoo

politicsMay 1, 2026872,747

Sen. Chris Van Hollen publicly defended Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner after reports that Platner has a Nazi-linked tattoo and made controversial past comments. Van Hollen cited Platner's PTSD and argued that "second chances matter" as justification for backing him. The endorsement from a senior Democrat could affect perceptions in the Maine race while prompting scrutiny over candidate vetting and standards for public office.

Aparna Nair
@disabilitystor1.bsky.social

I think that I do not consider it being a function of the "Bluesky bubble" that people might consider a Nazi tattoo disqualifying.


Peter Sagal

‪@petersagal.bsky.social‬

Follow
FWIW: While on here he is History's Greatest Monster (Senate primary subdivision) I was in Maine recently and talked to some Dem-leaning voters and they were very positive about Graham Platner while well aware of his flaws etc. 

There may be no better current example of the Bluesky Bubble.
10:03 AM · Apr 30, 2026

Everybody can reply
22 reposts
35 quotes
376 likes
8 saves








Write your reply

‪Peter Sagal‬
 ‪@petersagal.bsky.social‬
· 1d
Folks, rather than shouting at me or insulting me or holding me up as an example of Everything That’s Bad and How We Got Trump just block me! It’ll save us both time and trouble.







‪Peter Sagal‬
 ‪@petersagal.bsky.social‬
· 1d
Well, this has been depressing.







‪David Roberts‬
 ‪@volts.wtf‬
· 1d
Welcome to bluesky.
5404d ago
Aparna Nair137

I see the pro-Platner bots and trolls are teeming; girl, Im not even American, I just think a Nazi tattoo is disqualifying; on any politician, anywhere. You can vote for your pet Nazi, and live your life.

Bess Hamilton85

I know I'm old because I remember a time when a person would be *immediately* dropped as a candidate the moment the party heads learned about a Nazi tattoo. And it would be so swift & thorough a dropping that no one would remember the guy's name. He'd be a niche trivia answer.

Neil59

"Bluesky bubble" is pretty much journalist-speak for "I thought I'd be congratulated for a clever take but instead people were mean to me".

Aparna Nair58

Not a bunch of you showing up to tell me why you support this candidate in the comments: do as you please, I really do not care. My post was directly addressing the dismissive nature of Sagal's claim that it was a "Bubble" which produces critiques of Pl*tner.

Dr. Katja Thieme (she/they)56

Some peeps will be claiming we need ways to disagree. And then when they encounter disagreement they’ll call those disagreeing a huddle in a bubble.

Immigrant Punk31

I'm tempted to pin this for a while...

Spider.29

Ah, yes, the old men at my synagogue, part of the BlueSky bubble.

stephkat17.bsky.social25

Peter also spent many many months defending and supporting Olivia Nuzzi soooo he can have a seat actually.

Jeff, formerly of MN and MA, still God of Cookies25

Wait! Wait! Don't tell me! WHITE PEOPLE WILL EXCUSE ANYTHING!

Erik Vorhes24

“Well, this has been depressing,” feels pretty accurate, but Peter and I mean different things by “this,” I guess. (I really don’t understand the willful disregard of a Totenkopf tattoo and recent ableist language.)

Matt20

Sagal said people canceling their Washington Post subscriptions is "How We Got Trump." It's what Trump wants, we're betraying journalists, etc. Weapons-grade cynical smugness, exacerbated by the fact that he seems to think he's a distinguished media theorist by virtue of his game show being on NPR.

Jon Phillips15

Every time he pops up in my feed, it's pushing the absolute worst takes, defending the absolute worst people

E. Hatt-Swank8

How exactly is it being in a "bubble" to say "damn, the voters in Maine are potentially screwing up a good chance to beat Susan Collins and i wish they would reconsider"? Folks are allowed to have different opinions on a topic.

kckckc | free link7

A while back, he was whining about how posting is pointless. I think I have him blocked, but he has a gazillion followers. Bad take after bad take

Rev. Deral "FreeLink" Fenderson7

I'd be down on the guy on Facebook or Twitter or anywhere else besides here. He lost me at "Nazi tattoo" and then finding out more didn't improve him any in my opinion ("Blacks don't tip", the mercenary work, just being at Abu Gharaib, the recent r-word slur usage, etc) We gotta do better. 🤷‍♂️

THAAD7

It's weird to me, because Bluesky is actually the main place I *do* see how eager certain sorts of Democrat are to embrace an obvious Strasserite.

Worf's Aunt Masha from Babruysk7

If that is now a function of the "Bluesky bubble", we are cooked.

Call me Trixie6

I don't feel bad about it either. I don't care that he's popular. I'm too old to care about what's popular. People don't like Nazi tattoos. Look at how much everyone hates Hegseth and multiply that.

Import Jr. Records6

are… are they saying that wanting someone who didn’t have a “Nazi phase” or whatever is … a “purity test” now too or something? like, getting into one of the most awful, basically cannibalistic political parties just because some algorithm pushed it at you is forgivable? we are doomed

Dan Mitchell5

Nobody said anything like that he's "history's greatest monster." Guys walking around with Nazi tattoos (and etc.) is a problem, even when we vote for them in order to defeat ghouls and wantwits. (Also, did @volts.wtf endorse Sagal's "bubble" talk there?).

Paul Callahan (he/him)4

"Bluesky bubble" = The last remnants of human decency. I don't even mean it facetiously. Of course, there are decent people not on Bluesky or any social media (or maybe who haven't left X yet though I'm not sure). But standards have dropped and what should be disqualifying doesn't faze many people

Olivia Just Wants Tech To Be Fun Again4

Okay Peter Sagal, where in Maine were you? What was the average age of the people you spoke with? And please, define for us what precisely do you mean by "flaws"? Were said "flaws" defined for these people you allegedly spoke with?

costrike3

Whenever I hang a "kick me" sign on my back, I try to resist the urge to play the victim

Ozma2

Also there was a hot dispute on it here? With the more famous politically inflential people on the side of slur use & Nazi tits? And most other bigshots staying neutral? So how is that a bubble? People argued and landed on different sides. You could go either way.

Caldé time2

Media bubble has rotted Peter's brain

Michael Clyne2

"Everything I don't like is a bluesky bubble!" I happily blocked Sagal for this bullshit.

LurkyMcLurk2

I think anyone who hosts Wait Wait Don’t Tell Me should be fired into the sun, really

Frank Conniff
@frankconniff.bsky.social

Establishment Democrats, as they are wont to do, screwed up, and it looks like the Nazi tattoo guy Is going to win the primary. Oh well, look at it this way I guess: between Graham Platner and Susan Collins, Platner is the Fuhrer of two evils.

1735d ago
Stashdragon9

They really couldn't find anyone better than an ex-nazi? Well, I guess they are a really dumb state. I feel bad for any Jewish, Black and Brown people who are watching this happen. I would not feel safe in that state anymore.

CK8

Hey Frank, watch Platner's interview with Medhi Hasan and then judge the guy. Or do you just want to inflexibly hold on to a first impression you heard someone else talk about?

Andrew Tressler6

Bernie fucking Sanders worked to get this guy the nomination and you're still reflexively blaming Democrats.

Kwertzy Industries6

Maine Kampf and Miss Very Concerned

Evan in NH6

Frank, Platner is much more than his offensive tattoo and stupid Reddit comments. He’s a good example of a person on a positive life journey who genuinely appears to concerned for the best interests of his fellow Mainers and Americans. I was wary about him after the tattoo BS but he won me over.

TV's Adam, getting some buzzards involved,5

i'm trying to think about the silver lining regardless of the outcome: if platner wins collins isn't in the senate anymore, and if collins wins democrats might learn a valuable lesson about letting a guy who etched nazi iconography into his flesh run for senate under their banner

mjpeez.bsky.social5

Vote blue no matter who instead of crying Nazi when you don’t get your way

Joe Frollo4

No nazi tattoos No sexual abuse history No photos/videos in blackface Seems like three pretty simple standards to hold some to for a Senate position.

Candy3

I'm hoping he'll be the opposite of what Fetterman turned out to be.

Kat Aclyzmic2

I’m frankly thrilled. Give me a progressive who’s learned from a rough past over a dem headpiece who speaks only for corporations any day of the week.

1 source