Skip to content

The Assault On Science Funding Continues

scienceJul 24, 2026311,055

Science journalist Derek Lowe at Science and the American Association for the Advancement of Science warn that the Trump administration is actively targeting academic research funding and seeking to reallocate federal grants to political allies and large tech firms. Lowe writes that the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy report by OSTP director Michael Kratsios functions as cover to shift money toward AI firms and hyperscalers, rather than public basic research. Critics point to concrete actions consistent with that shift, including the Department of Health and Human Services canceling 53 of 67 teen-pregnancy-prevention grants and new rules tying funding to conservative priorities. Several researchers say the policy environment is already driving talent losses; three brain scientists, Ron Mangun, Tamara Swaab, and Megan Peters, are reported to be leaving University of California campuses for positions in the United Kingdom. Commenters and scientists characterize the effort as an attempt to concentrate funding and political power with administration allies rather than sustain long-term, broad public investment in science. The immediate effects reported are lab downsizing, grant cancellations, and increased outward mobility of researchers, with critics warning those trends will weaken the federal research ecosystem if the proposals proceed.

Mark Histed
@markhisted.org

I co-sign this great summary from @dereklowe.bsky.social . The goal is to destroy academic science, and these are the reasons. And all the “gold standard” and “needs reform” and “not high risk” stuff is transparent bullshit to hide the ball on what they are doing.

=
Science
science. But let me make something clear right up front. When I talk to people about this subject (and that includes some journalists as well) and say what I'm about to at the end of this paragaph I am sometimes met with disbelief. But I mean what I say and I am trying my best to say what I mean: The Trump administration hates academic science funding, full stop. They hate where that money goes, and they hate who it goes to. They want to keep all that money for themselves, to hand out to favored cronies who can help them get elected and to steer yet more money and more power back into their hands.
That's it. That's the story. They are naturally not putting it in those words, but instead talking about "gold standard science" and the
"reproducibility crisis" and funding "bold inquiry" for "transformational
breakthroughs". This is all bullshit, and it's important to realize that. Shameless hand-waving bullshit, delivered in a how-dare-vou-
30813h ago
Derek Lowe
@dereklowe.bsky.social

Thoughts on the various Trump administration proposals to revamp US science funding - and what they all have in common:

23723h ago
Quoting this
Alex Wild181

This is a blunt assessment of what the Trump regime is proposing for US science: they plan to take all the funding, essentially collapsing university-based research, in order to give that money to themselves, and they are lying about it.

Needhi Bhalla 💅🏽24

"Instead, it’s time for politics...This destruction will take place most easily in an atmosphere of worn-out apathy and helplessness, so give them the opposite. Make it hard for these people, because if they get their way it’s for sure that they want to make it very, very hard on you."

Chase Million22

By training and culture, scientists tend to assume that others are acting generally in good faith, not willfully lying, and share an interest in pursuit of truth for the good of humanity. This is easily exploited by hostile and bad faith actors. Sometimes the correct response is "Fuck you, liar."

Alex Wild21

Another way to think of Trump's proposal is: He is taking public money from people who don't pay bribes, or don't have enough money to pay bribes, being middle class scientists, and dangling it front of the techbro billionaires, because they *do* pay bribes.

Brandon Bishop18

"administration hates academic science funding, full stop. They hate where that money goes, and they hate who it goes to. They want to keep all that money for themselves, to hand out to favored cronies who can help them get elected and to steer yet more money and more power back into their hands."

betsythemuffin.bsky.social16

Another piece of the puzzle: These proposals are largely from people who couldn't hack lab sciences but could hack sophomoric Tumblr "rationalist" bullshit, and who need to convince themselves that they're "technical."

Philip Ball15

What Derek says. All of it. Forget all the chin-scratching analyses of the Trump administrations "proposals" & plans - it comes down to this. It's time we simply said it.

Boston Tom Levenson13

Read this. Lowe is exactly right. See below for the key fact to keep in mind whenever a member of the Trump administration opens his (almost always a his, not a hers) mouth about science funding. Federal spending on science is intolerable to them; in their minds, that cash belongs to them.

Brandon Bishop13

If your professional society leaders aren't talking like this, it's time to get new leaders.

David John Gagne II8

Russ Vought and crew are just like Hans Gruber: trying to act sophisticated when in reality they’re just a bunch of petty thieves stealing our future. Fighting back is working; let’s keep it up.

1 source