Leaked CDC paper shows 2025, 26 COVID vaccine 53, 55% effective, publication blocked

RFK Jr. and the CDC’s top official, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, don’t want you to read this. Paper shows that 2025-2026 Covid-19 vaccines were effective. They censored it. That’s exactly why we need to read it. So, we published it in Inside Medicine! Take a look... open.substack.com/pub/insideme...

The amazing @jeremyfaust.bsky.social got the CDC paper that Jay Bhattacharya censored, which shows that the COVID19 vaccine was at least 53% effective in reducing hospitalizations. Why doesn’t Bhattacharya want the public to see it? IMO it’s because it proves him wrong, and he is a weak man.

Here's the CDC report -- on how effective the Covid vaccines are -- that was censored by Jay Bhattacharya. Good for @jeremyfaust.bsky.social getting the leak: insidemedicine.substack.com/p/exclusive-...

The NIH director and acting CDC director blocked the publication of an MMW&R report which shown that COVID vaccines were protective against bad disease outcomes in the 2025-2026 season. The paper is now leaked and linked in this piece by Jeremy Faust. substack.com/home/post/p-...

‼️ Kudos to Dr @jeremyfaust.bsky.social for posting the Covid-19 vaccine paper that Jay Bhattacharya politically censored His politicization of science has been so extreme—& so dangerous Dr Faust obtained the censored paper from “someone close to the study” open.substack.com/pub/insideme...

Inside Medicine: Exclusive: Here's the Covid-19 vaccine paper the CDC censored /RFK Jr. and the CDC’s top official, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, don’t want you to read this. That’s exactly why you should. by Jeremy Faust @jeremyfaust.bsky.social some fine independent journalism bit.ly/4cP90Tc

Thanks to Dr Faust for posting this. One way to get transparency. open.substack.com/pub/insideme...

Here’s the paper Dr. Bhattacharya would not publish. Via @jeremyfaust.bsky.social insidemedicine.substack.com/p/exclusive-...

Analysis of the 2024-2025 season showed that COVID vaccines are beneficial in immunocompetent adults. The only reason to block publication of a study showing similar benefits in 2025-2026 is that it conflicts with the administration's preferred narrative that healthy adults don't need vaccination.

"The results suggest that, in the first few months after vaccination (September–December 2025), this year’s vaccines were 53–55% effective against hospitalizations among the study’s population of adults without immune compromise." insidemedicine.substack.com/p/exclusive-...

Jeremy Faust got a copy of the censored paper and published it: https://insidemedicine.substack.com/p/exclusive-heres-the-covid-19-vaccine. Faust’s source says that they think RFKJr doesn’t want to publish the study because he wants to weaken CDC recommendations for the vaccines this year […]

Nonsense, The graph goes off a cliff in 2020. Until then it’s pretty flat. Covid Vaccine policy in Uk is limited, we have had years nosocomial covid infections ripping through our unventilated crowded hospital wards 🇬🇧 🤷‍♀️

read what “they” don’t want anybody to know about Covid vaccine:

I want to thank Dr. Jeremy Faust from Inside Medicine for sharing the COVID-19 study that was subjected to prior restraint aka not published in the MMWR by this CDC. The study can be accessed from this article. The vaccine does prevent hospitalizations in over half of nnon-immunocompromised adults.