Skip to content

Jamil Smith column on the Callais ruling and voting rights

journalismMay 3, 20267222

Jamil Smith writes in The Guardian that the Supreme Court's Callais ruling strips a key constraint from the Voting Rights Act by requiring proof of discriminatory intent rather than focusing on discriminatory impact. Smith argues the decision rests on the assumption that American leaders and institutions will self-correct racial bias, a premise he calls hollow given the country's history of failing to protect Black citizens' voting rights. He warns the ruling will make it much harder to challenge racially harmful voting laws and could sharply reduce Black representation in state and local government. Smith urges renewed legal and political efforts to rebuild voting protections so the Court's faith in self-correction does not erase civil rights gains.

2 sources